How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Displays & pen tablets
  3. Asus ProArt PA32USD
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Asus ProArt PA32USD

10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ProArt PA32USD — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the ProArt PA32USD

Apple Studio Display XDR
1
Apple · 2026Studio Display XDR
9.7
Same price ≈ $3,200
  • Brightness (typical) 1,000 nits vs 250 nits
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Peak brightness (HDR) 2,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • Panel type Mini-LED (IPS) vs OLED
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
Dell UltraSharp U3226Q
2
Dell · 2026UltraSharp U3226Q
8.9
21% cheaper ≈ $2,450
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 96 W
  • Response time 0.03 ms vs 0.1 ms
  • HDR DisplayHDR True Black 500 vs HDR10
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Weight 9.84 kg vs 6.96 kg
Dell UltraSharp U5226KW
4
Dell · 2026UltraSharp U5226KW
8.1
18% cheaper ≈ $2,500
  • Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 250 nits
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 96 W
  • HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
  • Response time 8 ms vs 0.1 ms
LG UltraFine 32U990A
7
8.7
46% cheaper ≈ $1,650
  • Pixel density 224 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 250 nits
  • HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
ViewSonic VP2786A-4K
8
ViewSonic · 2025VP2786A-4K
8.3
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 250 nits
  • HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
  • Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) ΔE 2 vs ΔE 1
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 1,500,000:1
EIZO ColorEdge CG3100X
9
EIZO · 2025ColorEdge CG3100X
7.6
48% pricier ≈ $4,600
  • Brightness (typical) 500 nits vs 250 nits
  • Pixel density 152 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Height adjustment 155 mm vs 130 mm
  • Refresh rate 61 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,800:1 vs 1,500,000:1
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare