9% pricier ≈ $1,000
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 450 nits
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
Alternatives to BenQ MA320UG
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the MA320UG — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the MA320UG
Same price ≈ $900
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Anti-glare / matte screen
- Weight 8.56 kg vs 9.64 kg
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
28% pricier ≈ $1,200
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 450 nits
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
17% pricier ≈ $1,100
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Weight 8.64 kg vs 9.64 kg
- Refresh rate 70 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Screen size 27″ vs 31.5″
Same price ≈ $900
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 96 W
- Anti-glare / matte screen
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs DisplayHDR 400
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
5% cheaper ≈ $870
- Anti-glare / matte screen
- Weight 8.3 kg vs 9.64 kg
- Pixel density 109 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 450 nits
70% pricier ≈ $1,550
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Swivel
57% pricier ≈ $1,450
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 450 nits
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
32% cheaper ≈ $630
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 96 W
- Anti-glare / matte screen
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 450 nits
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
18% cheaper ≈ $750
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Response time 1 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 450 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- HDR HDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400