How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Displays & pen tablets
  3. BenQ SW272U
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to BenQ SW272U

10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the SW272U — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the SW272U

Asus ProArt PA27UCDMR
1
Asus · 2026ProArt PA27UCDMR
8.8
4% pricier ≈ $1,450
  • Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Asus ProArt PA32UCDM
2
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32UCDM
8.1
5% pricier ≈ $1,450
  • Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW
3
Dell · 2024UltraSharp U4025QW
9.0
22% pricier ≈ $1,700
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • Pixel density 139 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
LG UltraFine 32U990A
4
8.8
27% pricier ≈ $1,750
  • Pixel density 224 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
  • Height adjustment 60 mm vs 140 mm
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Asus ProArt PA32QCV
5
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32QCV
8.1
13% cheaper ≈ $1,200
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500:1 vs 1,000:1
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
  • Weight 9.3 kg vs 8.6 kg
BenQ PD3225U
6
BenQ · 2024PD3225U
8.5
21% cheaper ≈ $1,100
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  • Screen size 31.5″ vs 27″
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 85 W vs 90 W
BenQ PD2730S
7
BenQ · 2025PD2730S
9.2
15% cheaper ≈ $1,150
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Apple Studio Display (2026)
8
9.6
15% pricier ≈ $1,600
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
9
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3
20% pricier ≈ $1,650
  • Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Swivel
Asus ProArt PA32UCE
10
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32UCE
8.1
25% cheaper ≈ $1,050
  • Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
  • Screen size 31.5″ vs 27″
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Height adjustment 120 mm vs 140 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare