How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Displays & pen tablets
  3. BenQ SW272U
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to BenQ SW272U

10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the SW272U — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the SW272U

Asus ProArt PA32UCDM
1
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32UCDM
8.1
9% pricier ≈ $1,450
  • Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
LG UltraFine 32U990A
2
8.7
24% pricier ≈ $1,650
  • Pixel density 224 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
  • Height adjustment 60 mm vs 140 mm
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Asus ProArt PA27UCDMR
3
Asus · 2026ProArt PA27UCDMR
8.9
7% pricier ≈ $1,450
  • Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
BenQ PD2730S
4
BenQ · 2025PD2730S
9.0
13% cheaper ≈ $1,150
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
BenQ PD3225U
5
BenQ · 2024PD3225U
8.3
19% cheaper ≈ $1,100
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  • Screen size 31.5″ vs 27″
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 85 W vs 90 W
Asus ProArt PA32QCV
6
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32QCV
8.0
14% cheaper ≈ $1,150
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500:1 vs 1,000:1
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
  • Weight 9.3 kg vs 8.6 kg
Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
7
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3
16% pricier ≈ $1,550
  • Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Swivel
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW
8
Dell · 2024UltraSharp U4025QW
8.8
24% pricier ≈ $1,700
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • Pixel density 139 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Asus ProArt PA32UCE
9
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32UCE
7.9
20% cheaper ≈ $1,100
  • Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
  • Screen size 31.5″ vs 27″
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Height adjustment 120 mm vs 140 mm
Asus ProArt PA329CDV
10
Asus · 2026ProArt PA329CDV
9.1
13% cheaper ≈ $1,200
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Panel type OLED vs IPS
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 400 nits
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare