6% cheaper ≈ $630
- Response time 4 ms vs 5 ms
- Weight 6.8 kg vs 7.06 kg
- Height adjustment 155 mm vs 150 mm
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 450 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500:1 vs 3,000:1
Alternatives to Dell UltraSharp U2725QE
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the UltraSharp U2725QE — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the UltraSharp U2725QE
12% pricier ≈ $750
- Response time 1 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 450 nits
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 3,000:1
18% cheaper ≈ $550
- Pixel density 184 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 500 nits vs 450 nits
- Weight 6.2 kg vs 7.06 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 100 W vs 140 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 3,000:1
34% pricier ≈ $900
- Screen size 31.5″ vs 27″
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Weight 9.34 kg vs 7.06 kg
10% cheaper ≈ $600
- Screen size 34″ vs 27″
- Response time 4 ms vs 5 ms
- Height adjustment 155 mm vs 150 mm
- Pixel density 110 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 450 nits
18% pricier ≈ $790
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Weight 5.91 kg vs 7.06 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
49% pricier ≈ $1,000
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 450 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
61% pricier ≈ $1,100
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Anti-glare / matte screen
75% pricier ≈ $1,150
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 140 W
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs DisplayHDR 600
34% pricier ≈ $900
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 140 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 3,000:1