Same price ≈ $900
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 450 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
Alternatives to Dell UltraSharp U3225QE
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the UltraSharp U3225QE — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the UltraSharp U3225QE
17% cheaper ≈ $770
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Response time 1 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 450 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 3,000:1
Same price ≈ $920
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Anti-glare / matte screen
26% cheaper ≈ $690
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Weight 7.06 kg vs 9.34 kg
- Screen size 27″ vs 31.5″
14% pricier ≈ $1,050
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 450 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
26% pricier ≈ $1,150
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Weight 8.3 kg vs 9.34 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 140 W
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs DisplayHDR 600
28% pricier ≈ $1,200
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Weight 8.64 kg vs 9.34 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Anti-glare / matte screen
10% cheaper ≈ $840
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Weight 5.91 kg vs 9.34 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
12% pricier ≈ $1,050
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 450 nits
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Weight 8.9 kg vs 9.34 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 3,000:1
32% cheaper ≈ $630
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Weight 6.8 kg vs 9.34 kg
- Response time 4 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 450 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500:1 vs 3,000:1