6% pricier ≈ $1,500
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 350 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
- Screen size 39.7″ vs 49″
Alternatives to Dell UltraSharp U4924DW
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the UltraSharp U4924DW — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the UltraSharp U4924DW
Same price ≈ $1,400
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Weight 8.6 kg vs 16.3 kg
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Screen size 27″ vs 49″
9% cheaper ≈ $1,250
- Response time 4 ms vs 5 ms
- Weight 15.8 kg vs 16.3 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 15 W vs 90 W
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 86 Hz
Same price ≈ $1,400
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
- Pivot (portrait rotation)
- Swivel
4% pricier ≈ $1,450
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 86 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 350 nits
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
21% pricier ≈ $1,700
- Pixel density 139 ppi vs 109 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 350 nits
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Pivot (portrait rotation)
28% pricier ≈ $1,800
- Pixel density 187 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Weight 6 kg vs 16.3 kg
- Height adjustment 130 mm vs 90 mm
- Screen size 23.6″ vs 49″
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
22% cheaper ≈ $1,100
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Weight 8.2 kg vs 16.3 kg
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 85 W vs 90 W
- Screen size 31.5″ vs 49″
14% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
- Weight 9.3 kg vs 16.3 kg
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Screen size 31.5″ vs 49″
28% cheaper ≈ $1,000
- DisplayPort inputs 2 vs 1
- Pixel density 104 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1