Same price ≈ $2,500
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.03 ms vs 8 ms
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 129 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 400 nits
- DisplayPort inputs 1 vs 2
Alternatives to Dell UltraSharp U5226KW
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the UltraSharp U5226KW — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the UltraSharp U5226KW
10% pricier ≈ $2,800
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 8 ms
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 129 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
13% cheaper ≈ $2,200
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 129 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 8 ms
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
35% cheaper ≈ $1,650
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 8 ms
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 129 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- DisplayPort inputs 1 vs 2
25% pricier ≈ $3,200
- Brightness (typical) 1,000 nits vs 400 nits
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 129 ppi
- Panel type Mini-LED (IPS) vs IPS
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Screen size 27″ vs 51.5″
43% cheaper ≈ $1,450
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 129 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 8 ms
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
38% cheaper ≈ $1,600
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 129 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
31% cheaper ≈ $1,750
- Pixel density 224 ppi vs 129 ppi
- Pivot (portrait rotation)
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 129 ppi
- Pivot (portrait rotation)
- Response time 5 ms vs 8 ms
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 140 W
- DisplayPort inputs 1 vs 2
43% cheaper ≈ $1,450
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 8 ms
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 129 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W