Same price ≈ $1,600
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Response time 6 ms vs 19 ms
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 1,600:1
Alternatives to EIZO ColorEdge CG2700S
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ColorEdge CG2700S — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ColorEdge CG2700S
10% pricier ≈ $1,800
- Pixel density 187 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Response time 5 ms vs 19 ms
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 80 W vs 92 W
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 400 nits
30% pricier ≈ $2,100
- Pixel density 164 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000,000:1 vs 1,600:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 19 ms
- Brightness (typical) 200 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 80 W vs 92 W
7% pricier ≈ $1,750
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
- Weight 6.3 kg vs 9.4 kg
Same price ≈ $1,650
- Pixel density 224 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Response time 5 ms vs 19 ms
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
- Height adjustment 60 mm vs 155 mm
17% cheaper ≈ $1,350
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Response time 5 ms vs 19 ms
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 92 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 1,600:1
4% pricier ≈ $1,700
- Pixel density 139 ppi vs 109 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 92 W
- Response time 5 ms vs 19 ms
- Pivot (portrait rotation)
- Weight 12.22 kg vs 9.4 kg
38% cheaper ≈ $1,000
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Response time 5 ms vs 19 ms
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 92 W
5% cheaper ≈ $1,550
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Response time 5 ms vs 19 ms
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
- Weight 14.1 kg vs 9.4 kg
- Height adjustment 130 mm vs 155 mm
50% pricier ≈ $2,450
- Pixel density 164 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 500 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 94 W vs 92 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,450:1 vs 1,600:1
- Weight 9.7 kg vs 9.4 kg