15% cheaper ≈ $390
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 220 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,200:1 vs 1,000:1
- Active area (surface) 742 cm² vs 690 cm²
- Report rate 200 RPS vs 260 RPS
- Response time 20 ms vs 14 ms
Alternatives to Huion Kamvas 16 (Gen 3)
10 pen displays at a similar price that compete with the Kamvas 16 (Gen 3) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Kamvas 16 (Gen 3)
20% pricier ≈ $550
- Pixel density 282 ppi vs 186 ppi
- Pressure levels 8,192 vs 16,384
- Report rate 220 RPS vs 260 RPS
22% cheaper ≈ $360
- Pixel density 266 ppi vs 186 ppi
- Express keys 7 vs 6
- Report rate 300 RPS vs 260 RPS
- Pressure levels 8,192 vs 16,384
- Response time 25 ms vs 14 ms
17% pricier ≈ $540
- Pixel density 259 ppi vs 186 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 100,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 220 nits
- Pressure levels 8,192 vs 16,384
- Active area (surface) 666 cm² vs 690 cm²
76% pricier ≈ $810
- Pixel density 284 ppi vs 186 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 220 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 100,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Report rate 220 RPS vs 260 RPS
- Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.4 mm vs ±0.3 mm
35% cheaper ≈ $300
- Express keys 8 vs 6
- Brightness (typical) 270 nits vs 220 nits
- Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.2 mm vs ±0.3 mm
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 186 ppi
- Dials, wheels & touch rings 1 vs 2
72% pricier ≈ $790
- Pixel density 243 ppi vs 186 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 220 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 100,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.4 mm vs ±0.3 mm
- Active area (surface) 569 cm² vs 690 cm²
52% cheaper ≈ $220
- Weight 0.86 kg vs 1.25 kg
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 186 ppi
- Express keys 5 vs 6
48% cheaper ≈ $240
- Brightness (typical) 285 nits vs 220 nits
- Report rate 300 RPS vs 260 RPS
- Weight 0.75 kg vs 1.25 kg
- Pressure levels 4,096 vs 16,384
- Pixel density 157 ppi vs 186 ppi
41% pricier ≈ $650
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 220 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 100,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Response time 0.2 ms vs 14 ms
- Pressure levels 8,192 vs 16,384
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 186 ppi