How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Displays & pen tablets
  3. Huion Kamvas 22
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Huion Kamvas 22

10 pen displays at a similar price that compete with the Kamvas 22 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Huion Kamvas 22
Huion · 2023
Kamvas 22
21.5″1920 × 10808,192476.6 × 268.1 mm
approx. price≈ $320
4.7

Alternatives to the Kamvas 22

XP-Pen Artist 22 Plus
1
XP-Pen · 2023Artist 22 Plus
5.0
25% pricier ≈ $400
  • Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
  • Fully laminated screen
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 220 nits
  • Report rate 200 RPS vs 220 RPS
  • Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.4 mm vs ±0.3 mm
XP-Pen Artist 10 (Gen 2)
2
XP-Pen · 2023Artist 10 (Gen 2)
4.6
16% cheaper ≈ $270
  • Pixel density 197 ppi vs 102 ppi
  • Fully laminated screen
  • Active area (surface) 284 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
  • Screen size 10.1″ vs 21.5″
XP-Pen Artist 24
3
XP-Pen · 2023Artist 24
7.0
  • Fully laminated screen
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 220 nits
  • Active area (surface) 1,562 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
  • Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.5 mm vs ±0.3 mm
XP-Pen Artist Pro 16 (Gen 2)
4
XP-Pen · 2024Artist Pro 16 (Gen 2)
8.9
22% pricier ≈ $390
  • Pixel density 189 ppi vs 102 ppi
  • Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
  • Fully laminated screen
  • Report rate 200 RPS vs 220 RPS
  • Active area (surface) 742 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
GAOMON PD156 Pro
5
GAOMON · 2026PD156 Pro
7.0
9% cheaper ≈ $290
  • Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
  • Weight 1.3 kg vs 3.9 kg
  • Active area (surface) 667 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
  • Screen size 15.5″ vs 21.5″
Huion Kamvas RDS-160
6
Huion · 2023Kamvas RDS-160
7.4
44% pricier ≈ $460
  • Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
  • Weight 1.26 kg vs 3.9 kg
  • Fully laminated screen
  • Active area (surface) 666 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
  • Response time 25 ms vs 14 ms
XP-Pen Artist Pro 14 (Gen 2)
7
XP-Pen · 2023Artist Pro 14 (Gen 2)
4.0
9% pricier ≈ $350
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 102 ppi
  • Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
  • Fully laminated screen
  • Active area (surface) 558 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
  • Report rate 200 RPS vs 220 RPS
XP-Pen Artist 16 (Gen 2)
8
XP-Pen · 2022Artist 16 (Gen 2)
5.7
22% cheaper ≈ $250
  • Pixel density 143 ppi vs 102 ppi
  • Fully laminated screen
  • Active area (surface) 654 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
  • Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.5 mm vs ±0.3 mm
XP-Pen Artist 16 (Gen 3)
9
XP-Pen · 2026Artist 16 (Gen 3)
7.5
6% cheaper ≈ $300
  • Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
  • Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
  • Weight 1.35 kg vs 3.9 kg
  • Active area (surface) 660 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
  • Screen size 15.5″ vs 21.5″
Wacom One 12
10
Wacom · 2023One 12
7.9
19% cheaper ≈ $260
  • Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.01 mm vs ±0.3 mm
  • Weight 0.7 kg vs 3.9 kg
  • Brightness (typical) 275 nits vs 220 nits
  • Pressure levels 4,096 vs 8,192
  • USB-C video input (one cable)
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare