9% cheaper ≈ $290
- Pixel density 143 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Fully laminated screen
- Active area (surface) 655 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
- Report rate 200 RPS vs 220 RPS
Alternatives to Huion Kamvas 22
10 pen displays at a similar price that compete with the Kamvas 22 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Kamvas 22
25% pricier ≈ $400
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- Fully laminated screen
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 220 nits
- Report rate 200 RPS vs 220 RPS
- Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.4 mm vs ±0.3 mm
6% cheaper ≈ $300
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Weight 1.26 kg vs 3.9 kg
- Fully laminated screen
- Active area (surface) 666 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
- Response time 25 ms vs 14 ms
- Fully laminated screen
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 220 nits
- Active area (surface) 1,562 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
- Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.5 mm vs ±0.3 mm
22% cheaper ≈ $250
- Pixel density 197 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Fully laminated screen
- Active area (surface) 284 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
- Screen size 10.1″ vs 21.5″
22% pricier ≈ $390
- Pixel density 189 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- Fully laminated screen
- Report rate 200 RPS vs 220 RPS
- Active area (surface) 742 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
9% pricier ≈ $350
- Report rate 266 RPS vs 220 RPS
- USB-C video input (one cable)
9% cheaper ≈ $290
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Weight 1.3 kg vs 3.9 kg
- Active area (surface) 667 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
- Screen size 15.5″ vs 21.5″
44% pricier ≈ $460
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Weight 1.26 kg vs 3.9 kg
- Fully laminated screen
- Active area (surface) 666 cm² vs 1,278 cm²
- Response time 25 ms vs 14 ms
34% pricier ≈ $430
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 320 nits vs 220 nits
- Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.01 mm vs ±0.3 mm
- Pressure levels 4,096 vs 8,192
- Active area (surface) 426 cm² vs 1,278 cm²