How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Displays & pen tablets
  3. Lenovo ThinkVision P32ud-40
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Lenovo ThinkVision P32ud-40

10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ThinkVision P32ud-40 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the ThinkVision P32ud-40

Lenovo ThinkVision P27ud-40
1
Lenovo · 2026ThinkVision P27ud-40
9.5
24% pricier ≈ $630
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Weight 6.8 kg vs 8.1 kg
  • Response time 4 ms vs 1 ms
  • Screen size 27″ vs 31.5″
ViewSonic VP2766-4K
2
ViewSonic · 2026VP2766-4K
9.2
33% cheaper ≈ $340
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Weight 5.5 kg vs 8.1 kg
  • Response time 5 ms vs 1 ms
  • Height adjustment 130 mm vs 155 mm
BenQ SW272QN
3
BenQ · 2026SW272QN
8.3
55% pricier ≈ $790
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 15 W
  • HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
  • Pixel density 109 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Response time 5 ms vs 1 ms
BenQ PD2732U
4
BenQ · 2026PD2732U
8.7
59% pricier ≈ $810
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
  • Response time 5 ms vs 1 ms
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
ViewSonic VP2488-4K
5
ViewSonic · 2025VP2488-4K
9.3
8% pricier ≈ $550
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 100 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 184 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 500 nits vs 350 nits
  • Response time 5 ms vs 1 ms
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
ViewSonic VP3276T-4K
7
ViewSonic · 2026VP3276T-4K
7.0
57% pricier ≈ $800
  • HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
  • Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500:1
  • Response time 5 ms vs 1 ms
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
BenQ MA320UG
8
BenQ · 2026MA320UG
8.9
81% pricier ≈ $920
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 350 nits
  • HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  • Response time 5 ms vs 1 ms
  • Anti-glare / matte screen
Dell UltraSharp U2725QE
9
Dell · 2025UltraSharp U2725QE
9.6
35% pricier ≈ $690
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 350 nits
  • Response time 5 ms vs 1 ms
  • Screen size 27″ vs 31.5″
Asus ProArt PA279CDV
10
Asus · 2026ProArt PA279CDV
9.4
77% pricier ≈ $900
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 166 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,500:1
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 350 nits
  • Height adjustment 130 mm vs 155 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare