9% pricier ≈ $1,400
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 15 W
- Refresh rate 86 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Response time 5 ms vs 4 ms
- Weight 16.3 kg vs 15.8 kg
Alternatives to Lenovo ThinkVision P49w-30
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ThinkVision P49w-30 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ThinkVision P49w-30
7% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 15 W
- Refresh rate 76 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Weight 13.27 kg vs 15.8 kg
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 350 nits
- Screen size 37.5″ vs 49″
37% pricier ≈ $1,750
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 350 nits
- Screen size 27″ vs 49″
17% pricier ≈ $1,500
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 350 nits
- Response time 5 ms vs 4 ms
- Screen size 39.7″ vs 49″
21% cheaper ≈ $1,000
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 15 W
- DisplayPort inputs 2 vs 1
- Refresh rate 76 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Pixel density 104 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
32% pricier ≈ $1,700
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 15 W
- Pixel density 139 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 350 nits
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Response time 5 ms vs 4 ms
9% pricier ≈ $1,400
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 15 W
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Screen size 27″ vs 49″
13% pricier ≈ $1,450
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Screen size 39.7″ vs 49″
14% cheaper ≈ $1,100
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 85 W vs 15 W
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 109 ppi
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Screen size 31.5″ vs 49″
- Response time 5 ms vs 4 ms
Same price ≈ $1,300
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 70 W vs 15 W
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
- Weight 8.5 kg vs 15.8 kg
- Pixel density 94 ppi vs 109 ppi
- Response time 11 ms vs 4 ms