13% pricier ≈ $680
- Pixel density 282 ppi vs 189 ppi
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Weight 1.27 kg vs 1.9 kg
- Brightness (typical) 200 nits vs 290 nits
- Response time 25 ms vs 12 ms
Alternatives to Wacom Cintiq 16
10 pen displays at a similar price that compete with the Cintiq 16 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Cintiq 16
17% cheaper ≈ $500
- Active area (surface) 1,562 cm² vs 666 cm²
- Screen size 23.8″ vs 15.5″
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 290 nits
- Report rate 220 RPS vs 240 RPS
5% cheaper ≈ $570
- Pixel density 282 ppi vs 189 ppi
- Multi-touch
- Report rate 220 RPS vs 240 RPS
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 1,400:1
27% cheaper ≈ $440
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Report rate 300 RPS vs 240 RPS
- Multi-touch
- Brightness (typical) 220 nits vs 290 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,200:1 vs 1,400:1
10% cheaper ≈ $540
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 259 ppi vs 189 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 100,000:1 vs 1,400:1
23% cheaper ≈ $460
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Weight 1.26 kg vs 1.9 kg
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 189 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 220 nits vs 290 nits
28% cheaper ≈ $430
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 189 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 290 nits
8% cheaper ≈ $550
- Pixel density 282 ppi vs 189 ppi
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Weight 1.27 kg vs 1.9 kg
- Brightness (typical) 220 nits vs 290 nits
- Response time 25 ms vs 12 ms
8% pricier ≈ $650
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Contrast ratio (static) 100,000:1 vs 1,400:1
- Response time 0.2 ms vs 12 ms
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 189 ppi
- Active area (surface) 485 cm² vs 666 cm²
17% pricier ≈ $700
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Active area (surface) 941 cm² vs 666 cm²
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 290 nits
- Report rate 220 RPS vs 240 RPS