34% pricier ≈ $470
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Panel type IPS vs LCD (other)
- Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.3 mm vs ±0.5 mm
- Response time 14 ms vs 8 ms
Alternatives to XP-Pen Artist 22 (Gen 2)
10 pen displays at a similar price that compete with the Artist 22 (Gen 2) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Artist 22 (Gen 2)
9% cheaper ≈ $320
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Panel type IPS vs LCD (other)
- Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.3 mm vs ±0.5 mm
- Brightness (typical) 220 nits vs 250 nits
- Response time 14 ms vs 8 ms
23% pricier ≈ $430
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Express keys 8 vs 5
- Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.01 mm vs ±0.5 mm
- Response time 16.4 ms vs 8 ms
- Active area (surface) 664 cm² vs 1,275 cm²
23% cheaper ≈ $270
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Weight 1.35 kg vs 5.05 kg
- Response time 25 ms vs 8 ms
- Active area (surface) 666 cm² vs 1,275 cm²
Same price ≈ $350
- Express keys 8 vs 5
- Report rate 266 RPS vs 220 RPS
- Panel type IPS vs LCD (other)
- Brightness (typical) 220 nits vs 250 nits
14% pricier ≈ $400
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 800:1
- Report rate 200 RPS vs 220 RPS
- Response time 14 ms vs 8 ms
49% pricier ≈ $520
- Express keys 20 vs 5
- Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.01 mm vs ±0.5 mm
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 800:1
- Report rate 200 RPS vs 220 RPS
- Response time 14 ms vs 8 ms
14% cheaper ≈ $300
- Express keys 10 vs 5
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Response time 25 ms vs 8 ms
- Active area (surface) 666 cm² vs 1,275 cm²
32% pricier ≈ $460
- Express keys 10 vs 5
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 102 ppi
- Response time 25 ms vs 8 ms
- Active area (surface) 666 cm² vs 1,275 cm²
49% pricier ≈ $520
- Pixel density 186 ppi vs 102 ppi
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Express keys 8 vs 5
- Brightness (typical) 220 nits vs 250 nits
- Active area (surface) 688 cm² vs 1,275 cm²