How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Pro Display XDR vs ProArt PA32UCX

Apple Pro Display XDR vs Asus ProArt PA32UCX

What Pro Display XDR does better (3) and where ProArt PA32UCX wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Apple Pro Display XDR
Apple · 2019Pro Display XDR
3 advantages
vs
Asus ProArt PA32UCX
Asus · 2020ProArt PA32UCX
7.8Score
1 advantage≈ $2,350
Higher score
9.7Screen8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pro Display XDRProArt PA32UCX
718 × 41227727 × 600240
Pro Display XDRProArt PA32UCXDifference
Height412 mm600 mm−188 mm
Width718 mm727 mm−9 mm
Depth27 mm240 mm−213 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pro Display XDR better than ProArt PA32UCX?

  1. Pixel density218 ppi vs 138 ppi+58%
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,000,000:1 vs 20,000:150×
  3. Peak brightness (HDR)1,600 nits vs 1,200 nits+33%

Why is ProArt PA32UCX better than Pro Display XDR?

  1. Brightness (typical)500 nits vs 600 nits+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ProArt PA32UCXAsus ProArt PA32UCX≈ $2,3507.8
Display
Screen size32″32″
Resolution6016 × 33843840 × 2160
Resolution class6K4K UHD
Pixel density218 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)500 nits600 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)1,600 nits1,200 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000,000:120,000:1
Response time—5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screen—Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
Adobe RGB coverage—99.5%
DCI-P3 coverage—99%
Rec. 2020 coverage—89%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)—ΔE 1
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibration—Yes
HDR—HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—60 W
ThunderboltYes—
HDMI inputs—3
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hub—Yes
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)—Yes
Swivel—Yes
VESA mount—100 × 100 mm
Weight—14 kg
Width718 mm727 mm
Height412 mm600 mm
Depth27 mm240 mm
Product lineApple Pro DisplayASUS ProArt
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare