How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA249CGV vs UltraFine 32U701B

Asus ProArt PA249CGV vs LG UltraFine 32U701B

What ProArt PA249CGV does better (4) and where UltraFine 32U701B wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA249CGV
Asus · 2026ProArt PA249CGV
5.6Score
4 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 32U701B
3 advantages≈ $270
3.5Screen4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA249CGVUltraFine 32U701B
540.2 × 515.4190.4714 × 512256
ProArt PA249CGVUltraFine 32U701BDifference
Height515.4 mm512 mm+3.4 mm
Width540.2 mm714 mm−173.8 mm
Depth190.4 mm256 mm−65.6 mm
Weight5.3 kg5.6 kg−0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA249CGV better than UltraFine 32U701B?

  1. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 60 Hz2.4×
  2. Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 250 nits+40%
  3. Panel typeIPS vs VA
  4. Weight5.3 kg vs 5.6 kg+6%

Why is UltraFine 32U701B better than ProArt PA249CGV?

  1. Pixel density93 ppi vs 140 ppi+51%
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,500:1 vs 3,000:12×
  3. Screen size23.8″ vs 31.5″+32%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size23.8″31.5″
Resolution1920 × 10803840 × 2160
Resolution classFull HD4K UHD
Pixel density93 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSVA
Refresh rate144 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits250 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,500:13,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage95%—
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth8 bit—
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W—
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs11
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight5.3 kg5.6 kg
Width540 mm714 mm
Height515 mm512 mm
Depth190 mm256 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare