How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA278CGV vs PD2706U

Asus ProArt PA278CGV vs BenQ PD2706U

What ProArt PA278CGV does better (3) and where PD2706U wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA278CGV
Asus · 2023ProArt PA278CGV
6.0Score
3 advantages≈ $340
Higher score
vs
BenQ PD2706U
BenQ · 2023PD2706U
5.9Score
3 advantages≈ $490
4.3Screen6.8
6.2Connectivity4.3
7.6Design & ergonomics4.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA278CGVPD2706U
615 × 524228614 × 561238
ProArt PA278CGVPD2706UDifference
Height524 mm561 mm−37 mm
Width615 mm614 mm+1 mm
Depth228 mm238 mm−10 mm
Weight8.5 kg8.3 kg+0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA278CGV better than PD2706U?

  1. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 60 Hz2.4×
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  3. Height adjustment150 mm vs 110 mm+36%

Why is PD2706U better than ProArt PA278CGV?

  1. Pixel density109 ppi vs 163 ppi+50%
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 1,200:1+20%
  3. Weight8.5 kg vs 8.3 kg+2%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD2706UBenQ PD2706U≈ $4905.9
Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density109 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate144 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits350 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)400 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,200:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
DCI-P3 coverage95%95%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth10 bit—
HDR—DisplayHDR 400
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W90 W
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm110 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight8.5 kg8.3 kg
Width615 mm614 mm
Height524 mm561 mm
Depth228 mm238 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare