How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA278CV vs MateView GT

Asus ProArt PA278CV vs Huawei MateView GT

What ProArt PA278CV does better (1) and where MateView GT wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA278CV
Asus · 2022ProArt PA278CV
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ $330
Higher score
vs
Huawei MateView GT
Huawei · 2021MateView GT
4 advantages≈ $320
3.6Screen5.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA278CVMateView GT
615 × 524228613 × 546224
ProArt PA278CVMateView GTDifference
Height524 mm546 mm−22 mm
Width615 mm613 mm+2 mm
Depth228 mm224 mm+4 mm
Weight8.7 kg7.8 kg+0.9 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA278CV better than MateView GT?

  1. Panel typeIPS vs VA

Why is MateView GT better than ProArt PA278CV?

  1. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 4,000:14×
  2. Refresh rate75 Hz vs 165 Hz2.2×
  3. Response time5 ms vs 4 ms+25%
  4. Weight8.7 kg vs 7.8 kg+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution2560 × 14402560 × 1440
Resolution classQHD / 2.5KQHD / 2.5K
Pixel density109 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSVA
Refresh rate75 Hz165 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:14,000:1
Response time5 ms4 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYes—
Curved screen—Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
DCI-P3 coverage—90%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth8 bit—
HDR—HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W—
HDMI inputs11
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight8.7 kg7.8 kg
Width615 mm613 mm
Height524 mm546 mm
Depth228 mm224 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare