How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA278CV vs UltraFine 32UN880K

Asus ProArt PA278CV vs LG UltraFine 32UN880K

What ProArt PA278CV does better (4) and where UltraFine 32UN880K wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA278CV
Asus · 2022ProArt PA278CV
4.3Score
4 advantages≈ $330
vs
LG UltraFine 32UN880K
5.4Score
3 advantages≈ $410
Higher score
3.6Screen6.4
2.5Connectivity3.4
7.0Design & ergonomics4.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA278CVUltraFine 32UN880K
615 × 524228714 × 641407
ProArt PA278CVUltraFine 32UN880KDifference
Height524 mm641 mm−117 mm
Width615 mm714 mm−99 mm
Depth228 mm407 mm−179 mm
Weight8.7 kg10.3 kg−1.6 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA278CV better than UltraFine 32UN880K?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W vs 60 W+8%
  2. Refresh rate75 Hz vs 61 Hz+23%
  3. Weight8.7 kg vs 10.3 kg+18%
  4. Height adjustment150 mm vs 130 mm+15%

Why is UltraFine 32UN880K better than ProArt PA278CV?

  1. Pixel density109 ppi vs 140 ppi+28%
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  3. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density109 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate75 Hz61 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
DCI-P3 coverage—95%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth8 bit—
HDR—HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W60 W
HDMI inputs12
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight8.7 kg10.3 kg
Width615 mm714 mm
Height524 mm641 mm
Depth228 mm407 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare