How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA279CV vs MateView GT

Asus ProArt PA279CV vs Huawei MateView GT

What ProArt PA279CV does better (3) and where MateView GT wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA279CV
Asus · 2021ProArt PA279CV
6.6Score
3 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Huawei MateView GT
Huawei · 2021MateView GT
4 advantages≈ $320
6.5Screen5.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA279CVMateView GT
614 × 523.5227.8613 × 546224
ProArt PA279CVMateView GTDifference
Height523.5 mm546 mm−22.5 mm
Width614 mm613 mm+1 mm
Depth227.8 mm224 mm+3.8 mm
Weight8.6 kg7.8 kg+0.8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA279CV better than MateView GT?

  1. Pixel density163 ppi vs 109 ppi+50%
  2. Panel typeIPS vs VA
  3. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×

Why is MateView GT better than ProArt PA279CV?

  1. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 165 Hz2.8×
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 4,000:14×
  3. Response time5 ms vs 4 ms+25%
  4. Weight8.6 kg vs 7.8 kg+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution3840 × 21602560 × 1440
Resolution class4K UHDQHD / 2.5K
Pixel density163 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSVA
Refresh rate60 Hz165 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:14,000:1
Response time5 ms4 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYes—
Curved screen—Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
DCI-P3 coverage—90%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W—
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight8.6 kg7.8 kg
Width614 mm613 mm
Height524 mm546 mm
Depth228 mm224 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare