- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- ProArt PA27JCV vs UltraSharp UP2716DA
Asus ProArt PA27JCV vs Dell UltraSharp UP2716DA
What ProArt PA27JCV does better (5) and where UltraSharp UP2716DA wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Screen2.5
4.2Colour accuracy9.2
8.2Design & ergonomics2.8
Why is ProArt PA27JCV better than UltraSharp UP2716DA?
- Pixel density218 ppi vs 109 ppi2×
- Brightness (typical)400 nits vs 300 nits+33%
- SwivelYes · UltraSharp UP2716DA: No
- Contrast ratio (static)1,500:1 vs 1,000:1+50%
- Response time5 ms vs 6 ms+20%
Why is UltraSharp UP2716DA better than ProArt PA27JCV?
- Adobe RGB coverage95% vs 100%+5%
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 5120 × 2880 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | 5K | QHD / 2.5K |
| Pixel density | 218 ppi | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 400 nits | 300 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | 500 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,500:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 6 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | 95% | 100% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | 98% |
| Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) | ΔE 2 | — |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 96 W | — |
| KVM switch | Yes | — |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 130 mm | — |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | No |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 5.91 kg | — |
| Width | 612 mm | — |
| Height | 538 mm | — |
| Depth | 215 mm | — |
| Product line | ASUS ProArt | Dell UltraSharp |
