How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA27JCV vs VP2776T-4K

Asus ProArt PA27JCV vs ViewSonic VP2776T-4K

What ProArt PA27JCV does better (4) and where VP2776T-4K wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA27JCV
Asus · 2025ProArt PA27JCV
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ $790
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic VP2776T-4K
ViewSonic · 2024VP2776T-4K
7.5Score
2 advantages≈ $700
8.8Screen8.2
4.2Colour accuracy7.6
7.3Connectivity2.9
8.2Design & ergonomics5.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA27JCVVP2776T-4K
612.2 × 538.1215613.7 × 450.4234
ProArt PA27JCVVP2776T-4KDifference
Height538.1 mm450.4 mm+87.7 mm
Width612.2 mm613.7 mm−1.5 mm
Depth215 mm234 mm−19 mm
Weight5.9 kg7.6 kg−1.7 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA27JCV better than VP2776T-4K?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 15 W6.4×
  2. Pixel density218 ppi vs 163 ppi+34%
  3. Weight5.91 kg vs 7.6 kg+29%
  4. Height adjustment130 mm vs 120 mm+8%

Why is VP2776T-4K better than ProArt PA27JCV?

  1. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,500:1 vs 2,000:1+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution5120 × 28803840 × 2160
Resolution class5K4K UHD
Pixel density218 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)400 nits400 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)500 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,500:12,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
Adobe RGB coverage95%—
DCI-P3 coverage99%98%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W15 W
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs12
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm120 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight5.91 kg7.6 kg
Width612 mm614 mm
Height538 mm450 mm
Depth215 mm234 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare