- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- ProArt PA27UCDMR vs PD3226G
Asus ProArt PA27UCDMR vs BenQ PD3226G
What ProArt PA27UCDMR does better (8) and where PD3226G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Screen8.9
8.5Colour accuracy6.4
7.7Connectivity4.9
4.4Design & ergonomics6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
ProArt PA27UCDMRPD3226G
| ProArt PA27UCDMR | PD3226G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 571 mm | 636 mm | −65 mm |
| Width | 608 mm | 714 mm | −106 mm |
| Depth | 228 mm | 242 mm | −14 mm |
| Weight | 7.2 kg | 9.7 kg | −2.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ProArt PA27UCDMR better than PD3226G?
- Pixel density166 ppi vs 140 ppi+19%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:1 vs 1,200:11,250×
- Response time0.1 ms vs 1 ms10×
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 90 W+7%
- DCI-P3 coverage99% vs 95%+4%
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
- Weight7.2 kg vs 9.7 kg+35%
Why is PD3226G better than ProArt PA27UCDMR?
- Brightness (typical)250 nits vs 400 nits+60%
- HDRHDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
- SwivelNo · ProArt PA27UCDMR: Yes
- Screen size26.5″ vs 31.5″+19%
- Height adjustment130 mm vs 150 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 26.5″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 166 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 250 nits | 400 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | 1,000 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,500,000:1 | 1,200:1 |
| Response time | 0.1 ms | 1 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | 95% |
| Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) | ΔE 1 | — |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| Hardware calibration | Yes | — |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 96 W | 90 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | Yes |
| KVM switch | — | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Daisy chain (DP MST) | — | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 130 mm | 150 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | No | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 7.2 kg | 9.7 kg |
| Width | 608 mm | 714 mm |
| Height | 571 mm | 636 mm |
| Depth | 228 mm | 242 mm |
| Product line | ASUS ProArt | BenQ PD |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ProArt PA27UCDMRvsApple Studio Display (2026)
8.89.6
vs
Asus ProArt PA27UCDMRvsAsus ProArt PA32UCDMR
8.89.3
vs
Asus ProArt PA27UCDMRvsLG UltraFine 32U990A
8.88.8
vs
BenQ MA270SvsAsus ProArt PA27UCDMR
9.38.8
vs
BenQ MA320UGvsAsus ProArt PA27UCDMR
8.98.8
vs
BenQ PD3226GvsAsus ProArt PA32UCE
8.28.1