How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA328CGV vs ThinkVision P32p-20

Asus ProArt PA328CGV vs Lenovo ThinkVision P32p-20

What ProArt PA328CGV does better (5) and where ThinkVision P32p-20 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA328CGV
Asus · 2021ProArt PA328CGV
5.6Score
5 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
vs
Lenovo ThinkVision P32p-20
Lenovo · 2020ThinkVision P32p-20
5.2Score
2 advantages
5.6Screen4.7
4.0Colour accuracy3.1
6.8Connectivity3.9
4.2Design & ergonomics7.4

Why is ProArt PA328CGV better than ThinkVision P32p-20?

  1. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 60 Hz2.8×
  2. Brightness (typical)450 nits vs 350 nits+29%
  3. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  4. DCI-P3 coverage95% vs 90%+6%
  5. Response time5 ms vs 6 ms+20%

Why is ThinkVision P32p-20 better than ProArt PA328CGV?

  1. Pixel density92 ppi vs 140 ppi+52%
  2. Height adjustment130 mm vs 135 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size32″31.5″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density92 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate165 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)450 nits350 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)600 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms6 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage95%90%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W—
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYesYes
Ethernet (RJ45)—Yes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm135 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight11.7 kg—
Width727 mm—
Height602 mm—
Depth245 mm—
Product lineASUS ProArtLenovo ThinkVision
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare