How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA329CRV vs PD3205UA

Asus ProArt PA329CRV vs BenQ PD3205UA

What ProArt PA329CRV does better (3) and where PD3205UA wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA329CRV
Asus · 2023ProArt PA329CRV
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
BenQ PD3205UA
BenQ · 2023PD3205UA
4.6Score
0 advantages≈ $700
5.7Screen3.7
9.5Connectivity4.3
4.8Design & ergonomics3.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA329CRVPD3205UA
713.8 × 617.7240715 × 731459
ProArt PA329CRVPD3205UADifference
Height617.7 mm731 mm−113.3 mm
Width713.8 mm715 mm−1.2 mm
Depth240 mm459 mm−219 mm
Weight9.9 kg10.1 kg−0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA329CRV better than PD3205UA?

  1. Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 250 nits+40%
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  3. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 90 W+7%

Why is PD3205UA better than ProArt PA329CRV?

PD3205UA has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD3205UABenQ PD3205UA≈ $7004.6
Display
Screen size31.5″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits250 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)400 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage98%—
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W90 W
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight9.9 kg10.1 kg
Width714 mm715 mm
Height618 mm731 mm
Depth240 mm459 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare