How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32DC vs UltraSharp UP3221Q

Asus ProArt PA32DC vs Dell UltraSharp UP3221Q

What ProArt PA32DC does better (5) and where UltraSharp UP3221Q wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32DC
Asus · 2022ProArt PA32DC
7.8Score
5 advantages≈ $3,400
vs
Dell UltraSharp UP3221Q
Dell · 2020UltraSharp UP3221Q
8.8Score
2 advantages≈ $4,000
Higher score
7.0Screen8.0
6.9Colour accuracy6.5

Why is ProArt PA32DC better than UltraSharp UP3221Q?

  1. Contrast ratio (static)1,000,000:1 vs 1,300:1769.2×
  2. Response time0.1 ms vs 8 ms80×
  3. Adobe RGB coverage99% vs 93%+6%
  4. Panel typeOLED vs Mini-LED (IPS)
  5. HDMI inputs3 vs 2+50%

Why is UltraSharp UP3221Q better than ProArt PA32DC?

  1. Brightness (typical)250 nits vs 1,000 nits4×
  2. HDRHDR10 vs DisplayHDR 1000
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ProArt PA32DCAsus ProArt PA32DC≈ $3,4007.8
Display
Screen size31.5″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeOLEDMini-LED (IPS)
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)250 nits1,000 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)500 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000,000:11,300:1
Response time0.1 ms8 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
Adobe RGB coverage99%93%
DCI-P3 coverage99%99.8%
Rec. 2020 coverage—83%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 1—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibrationYes—
HDRHDR10DisplayHDR 1000
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W—
HDMI inputs32
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight7.6 kg—
Width735 mm—
Height627 mm—
Depth245 mm—
Product lineASUS ProArtDell UltraSharp
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare