- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- ProArt PA32QCV vs UltraFine 32UQ85X
Asus ProArt PA32QCV vs LG UltraFine 32UQ85X
What ProArt PA32QCV does better (4) and where UltraFine 32UQ85X wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Screen7.6
5.6Colour accuracy8.2
7.1Connectivity6.3
5.3Design & ergonomics2.0
Why is ProArt PA32QCV better than UltraFine 32UQ85X?
- Pixel density218 ppi vs 140 ppi+56%
- Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes · UltraFine 32UQ85X: No
- SwivelYes · UltraFine 32UQ85X: No
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 90 W+7%
Why is UltraFine 32UQ85X better than ProArt PA32QCV?
- HDRHDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Contrast ratio (static)1,500:1 vs 2,000:1+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 6016 × 3384 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 6K | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 218 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | 600 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,500:1 | 2,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 98% | 98% |
| Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) | ΔE 2 | — |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 96 W | 90 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| KVM switch | Yes | — |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 130 mm | — |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | No |
| Swivel | Yes | No |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Weight | 9.3 kg | — |
| Width | 714 mm | — |
| Height | 618 mm | — |
| Depth | 240 mm | — |
| Product line | ASUS ProArt | LG UltraFine |
