How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA348CGV vs ThinkVision P27h-20

Asus ProArt PA348CGV vs Lenovo ThinkVision P27h-20

What ProArt PA348CGV does better (6) and where ThinkVision P27h-20 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA348CGV
Asus · 2022ProArt PA348CGV
4.8Score
6 advantages≈ $630
Higher score
vs
Lenovo ThinkVision P27h-20
Lenovo · 2020ThinkVision P27h-20
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ $640
6.7Screen3.2
4.7Colour accuracy2.3
6.3Connectivity3.6
2.1Design & ergonomics3.8

Why is ProArt PA348CGV better than ThinkVision P27h-20?

  1. Response time2 ms vs 6 ms3×
  2. Colour depth10 bit vs 8 bit+25%
  3. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
  4. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  5. DCI-P3 coverage98% vs 85%+15%
  6. Screen size34″ vs 27″+26%

Why is ThinkVision P27h-20 better than ProArt PA348CGV?

  1. Height adjustment115 mm vs 135 mm+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size34″27″
Resolution3440 × 14402560 × 1440
Resolution classUltrawide QHDQHD / 2.5K
Pixel density110 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio21:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate120 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits350 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)400 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time2 ms6 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage98%85%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth10 bit8 bit
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W—
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Ethernet (RJ45)—Yes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment115 mm135 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)NoNo
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight12.2 kg—
Width818 mm—
Height569 mm—
Depth245 mm—
Product lineASUS ProArtLenovo ThinkVision
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare