How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. MA320UG vs VP3276T-4K

BenQ MA320UG vs ViewSonic VP3276T-4K

What MA320UG does better (4) and where VP3276T-4K wins (2) — every spec side by side.

BenQ MA320UG
BenQ · 2026MA320UG
8.7Score
4 advantages≈ $920
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic VP3276T-4K
ViewSonic · 2026VP3276T-4K
7.0Score
2 advantages≈ $800
8.0Screen7.0
6.7Colour accuracy7.6
8.8Connectivity2.9
6.2Design & ergonomics5.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

MA320UGVP3276T-4K
715 × 631230714.2 × 456.9209.7
MA320UGVP3276T-4KDifference
Height631 mm456.9 mm+174.1 mm
Width715 mm714.2 mm+0.8 mm
Depth230 mm209.7 mm+20.3 mm
Weight9.6 kg7.8 kg+1.8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MA320UG better than VP3276T-4K?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 15 W6.4×
  2. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
  3. Brightness (typical)450 nits vs 400 nits+12%
  4. Height adjustment150 mm vs 120 mm+25%

Why is VP3276T-4K better than MA320UG?

  1. Anti-glare / matte screenNo · MA320UG: Yes
  2. Weight9.64 kg vs 7.8 kg+24%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ MA320UGBenQ MA320UG≈ $9208.7
Display
Screen size31.5″32″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate120 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)450 nits400 nits
Contrast ratio (static)2,000:12,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenNoYes
Colour
sRGB coverage99%100%
DCI-P3 coverage98%98%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRDisplayHDR 400—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W15 W
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYes—
Daisy chain (DP MST)Yes—
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm120 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight9.64 kg7.8 kg
Width715 mm714 mm
Height631 mm457 mm
Depth230 mm210 mm
Product lineBenQ MA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare