How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD2706QN vs UltraFine 32U701B

BenQ PD2706QN vs LG UltraFine 32U701B

What PD2706QN does better (3) and where UltraFine 32U701B wins (4) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD2706QN
BenQ · 2025PD2706QN
4.2Score
3 advantages≈ $430
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 32U701B
4 advantages≈ $270
3.9Screen4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD2706QNUltraFine 32U701B
614 × 545220714 × 512256
PD2706QNUltraFine 32U701BDifference
Height545 mm512 mm+33 mm
Width614 mm714 mm−100 mm
Depth220 mm256 mm−36 mm
Weight9.3 kg5.6 kg+3.7 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD2706QN better than UltraFine 32U701B?

  1. Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 250 nits+40%
  2. Panel typeIPS vs VA
  3. Refresh rate100 Hz vs 60 Hz+67%

Why is UltraFine 32U701B better than PD2706QN?

  1. Pixel density109 ppi vs 140 ppi+28%
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 3,000:13×
  3. Weight9.32 kg vs 5.6 kg+66%
  4. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD2706QNBenQ PD2706QN≈ $4304.2
Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density109 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSVA
Refresh rate100 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits250 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:13,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage95%—
Colour depth8 bit—
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W—
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs11
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Daisy chain (DP MST)Yes—
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment115 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight9.32 kg5.6 kg
Width614 mm714 mm
Height545 mm512 mm
Depth220 mm256 mm
Product lineBenQ PD—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare