- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD2730S vs PD3225U
BenQ PD2730S vs BenQ PD3225U
What PD2730S does better (4) and where PD3225U wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD2730SPD3225U
| PD2730S | PD3225U | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 578 mm | 628 mm | −50 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 715 mm | −101 mm |
| Depth | 242 mm | 273 mm | −31 mm |
| Weight | 8.3 kg | 8.2 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD2730S better than PD3225U?
- Pixel density218 ppi vs 140 ppi+56%
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 85 W+6%
- Refresh rate76 Hz vs 60 Hz+27%
- sRGB coverage100% vs 98%+2%
Why is PD3225U better than PD2730S?
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 5120 × 2880 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 5K | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 218 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 76 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 2,000:1 | 2,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 98% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 98% | 98% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | — |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 85 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | Yes |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Daisy chain (DP MST) | Yes | — |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 8.3 kg | 8.2 kg |
| Width | 614 mm | 715 mm |
| Height | 578 mm | 628 mm |
| Depth | 242 mm | 273 mm |
| Product line | BenQ PD | — |
