- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD2732U vs SW272QN
BenQ PD2732U vs BenQ SW272QN
What PD2732U does better (2) and where SW272QN wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD2732USW272QN
| PD2732U | SW272QN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 545 mm | 592 mm | −47 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 614 mm | = |
| Depth | 242 mm | 274 mm | −32 mm |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | 8.3 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD2732U better than SW272QN?
- Pixel density163 ppi vs 109 ppi+50%
- Brightness (typical)400 nits vs 300 nits+33%
Why is SW272QN better than PD2732U?
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Height adjustment115 mm vs 140 mm+22%
- Weight8.56 kg vs 8.3 kg+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | QHD / 2.5K |
| Pixel density | 163 ppi | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 400 nits | 300 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| Adobe RGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | 99% |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 90 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | Yes |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 115 mm | 140 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 8.56 kg | 8.3 kg |
| Width | 614 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 545 mm | 592 mm |
| Depth | 242 mm | 274 mm |
