How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD2732U vs VP3276T-4K

BenQ PD2732U vs ViewSonic VP3276T-4K

What PD2732U does better (2) and where VP3276T-4K wins (5) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD2732U
BenQ · 2026PD2732U
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ $900
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic VP3276T-4K
ViewSonic · 2026VP3276T-4K
7.0Score
5 advantages≈ $800
7.1Screen7.0
9.7Colour accuracy7.6
4.6Connectivity2.9
4.4Design & ergonomics5.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD2732UVP3276T-4K
614 × 545242714.2 × 456.9209.7
PD2732UVP3276T-4KDifference
Height545 mm456.9 mm+88.1 mm
Width614 mm714.2 mm−100.2 mm
Depth242 mm209.7 mm+32.3 mm
Weight8.6 kg7.8 kg+0.8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD2732U better than VP3276T-4K?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 15 W6×
  2. Pixel density163 ppi vs 138 ppi+18%

Why is VP3276T-4K better than PD2732U?

  1. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 2,000:12×
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  3. Screen size27″ vs 32″+19%
  4. Weight8.56 kg vs 7.8 kg+10%
  5. Height adjustment115 mm vs 120 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD2732UBenQ PD2732U≈ $9008.6
Display
Screen size27″32″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density163 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)400 nits400 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:12,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
Adobe RGB coverage100%—
DCI-P3 coverage99%98%
Colour depth—10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W15 W
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs12
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment115 mm120 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight8.56 kg7.8 kg
Width614 mm714 mm
Height545 mm457 mm
Depth242 mm210 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare