- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD3205U vs ThinkVision P32p-30
BenQ PD3205U vs Lenovo ThinkVision P32p-30
What PD3205U does better (3) and where ThinkVision P32p-30 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Screen4.7
4.3Connectivity5.1
4.7Design & ergonomics7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD3205UThinkVision P32p-30
| PD3205U | ThinkVision P32p-30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 589 mm | 444 mm | +145 mm |
| Width | 715 mm | 714 mm | +1 mm |
| Depth | 257 mm | 235 mm | +22 mm |
| Weight | 9.4 kg | 10.1 kg | −0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD3205U better than ThinkVision P32p-30?
- Response time5 ms vs 6 ms+20%
- Weight9.4 kg vs 10.1 kg+7%
- sRGB coverage99% vs 95%+4%
Why is ThinkVision P32p-30 better than PD3205U?
- Brightness (typical)250 nits vs 350 nits+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 250 nits | 350 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 6 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | 95% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 95% |
| Colour depth | — | 10 bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | — |
| Thunderbolt | — | Yes |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (RJ45) | — | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | — | 155 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | — | Yes |
| VESA mount | — | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 9.4 kg | 10.1 kg |
| Width | 715 mm | 714 mm |
| Height | 589 mm | 444 mm |
| Depth | 257 mm | 235 mm |
| Product line | — | Lenovo ThinkVision |
