How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD3225U vs PD3226G

BenQ PD3225U vs BenQ PD3226G

What PD3225U does better (4) and where PD3226G wins (4) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD3225U
BenQ · 2024PD3225U
8.5Score
4 advantages≈ $1,100
Higher score
vs
BenQ PD3226G
BenQ · 2025PD3226G
8.2Score
4 advantages≈ $1,150
7.6Screen8.9
5.2Connectivity4.9
8.2Design & ergonomics6.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD3225UPD3226G
715 × 628273714 × 636242
PD3225UPD3226GDifference
Height628 mm636 mm−8 mm
Width715 mm714 mm+1 mm
Depth273 mm242 mm+31 mm
Weight8.2 kg9.7 kg−1.5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD3225U better than PD3226G?

  1. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  2. Contrast ratio (static)2,000:1 vs 1,200:1+67%
  3. DCI-P3 coverage98% vs 95%+3%
  4. Weight8.2 kg vs 9.7 kg+18%

Why is PD3226G better than PD3225U?

  1. Response time5 ms vs 1 ms5×
  2. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
  3. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)85 W vs 90 W+6%
  4. sRGB coverage98% vs 100%+2%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD3225UBenQ PD3225U≈ $1,1008.5
BenQ PD3226GBenQ PD3226G≈ $1,1508.2
Display
Screen size31.5″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz144 Hz
Brightness (typical)400 nits400 nits
Contrast ratio (static)2,000:11,200:1
Response time5 ms1 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage98%100%
DCI-P3 coverage98%95%
Colour depth—10 bit
HDRDisplayHDR 400DisplayHDR 400
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)85 W90 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switchYesYes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Daisy chain (DP MST)—Yes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm150 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight8.2 kg9.7 kg
Width715 mm714 mm
Height628 mm636 mm
Depth273 mm242 mm
Product line—BenQ PD
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare