How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD3225U vs ThinkVision P49w-30

BenQ PD3225U vs Lenovo ThinkVision P49w-30

What PD3225U does better (5) and where ThinkVision P49w-30 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD3225U
BenQ · 2024PD3225U
8.3Score
5 advantages≈ $1,100
Higher score
vs
Lenovo ThinkVision P49w-30
Lenovo · 2023ThinkVision P49w-30
5.8Score
3 advantages≈ $1,250
7.5Screen6.3
5.2Connectivity3.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD3225UThinkVision P49w-30
715 × 6282731,215 × 576254
PD3225UThinkVision P49w-30Difference
Height628 mm576 mm+52 mm
Width715 mm1,215 mm−500 mm
Depth273 mm254 mm+19 mm
Weight8.2 kg15.8 kg−7.6 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD3225U better than ThinkVision P49w-30?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)85 W vs 15 W5.7×
  2. Pixel density140 ppi vs 109 ppi+28%
  3. HDRDisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  4. Weight8.2 kg vs 15.8 kg+93%
  5. Brightness (typical)400 nits vs 350 nits+14%

Why is ThinkVision P49w-30 better than PD3225U?

  1. Screen size31.5″ vs 49″+56%
  2. Response time5 ms vs 4 ms+25%
  3. sRGB coverage98% vs 100%+2%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD3225UBenQ PD3225U≈ $1,1008.3
Display
Screen size31.5″49″
Resolution3840 × 21605120 × 1440
Resolution class4K UHD5K
Pixel density140 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:932:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)400 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)2,000:12,000:1
Response time5 ms4 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Curved screen—Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage98%100%
DCI-P3 coverage98%98%
HDRDisplayHDR 400HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)85 W15 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switchYesYes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight8.2 kg15.8 kg
Width715 mm1,215 mm
Height628 mm576 mm
Depth273 mm254 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare