How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD3225U vs UltraFine 40WP95C

BenQ PD3225U vs LG UltraFine 40WP95C

What PD3225U does better (5) and where UltraFine 40WP95C wins (3) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD3225U
BenQ · 2024PD3225U
8.3Score
5 advantages≈ $1,100
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 40WP95C
5.1Score
3 advantages≈ $1,150
7.5Screen5.8
5.2Connectivity9.2
8.1Design & ergonomics2.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD3225UUltraFine 40WP95C
715 × 628273947 × 615283
PD3225UUltraFine 40WP95CDifference
Height628 mm615 mm+13 mm
Width715 mm947 mm−232 mm
Depth273 mm283 mm−10 mm
Weight8.2 kg12.3 kg−4.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD3225U better than UltraFine 40WP95C?

  1. Brightness (typical)400 nits vs 300 nits+33%
  2. Contrast ratio (static)2,000:1 vs 1,000:12×
  3. HDRDisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  4. Weight8.2 kg vs 12.3 kg+50%
  5. Height adjustment150 mm vs 110 mm+36%

Why is UltraFine 40WP95C better than PD3225U?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)85 W vs 96 W+13%
  2. Screen size31.5″ vs 39.7″+26%
  3. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 72 Hz+20%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD3225UBenQ PD3225U≈ $1,1008.3
Display
Screen size31.5″39.7″
Resolution3840 × 21605120 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD5K
Pixel density140 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:921:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz72 Hz
Brightness (typical)400 nits300 nits
Contrast ratio (static)2,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Curved screen—Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage98%—
DCI-P3 coverage98%98%
HDRDisplayHDR 400HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)85 W96 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm110 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight8.2 kg12.3 kg
Width715 mm947 mm
Height628 mm615 mm
Depth273 mm283 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare