How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD3420Q vs ColorEdge CS2731

BenQ PD3420Q vs EIZO ColorEdge CS2731

What PD3420Q does better (4) and where ColorEdge CS2731 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD3420Q
BenQ · 2020PD3420Q
5.8Score
4 advantages≈ $1,000
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CS2731
EIZO · 2019ColorEdge CS2731
5.8Score
2 advantages≈ $860
Higher score
4.2Screen3.5
6.8Colour accuracy7.4
4.5Design & ergonomics7.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD3420QColorEdge CS2731
826 × 445244638 × 404.1265
PD3420QColorEdge CS2731Difference
Height445 mm404.1 mm+40.9 mm
Width826 mm638 mm+188 mm
Depth244 mm265 mm−21 mm
Weight9.3 kg10.1 kg−0.8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD3420Q better than ColorEdge CS2731?

  1. Response time5 ms vs 10 ms2×
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  3. Screen size34″ vs 27″+26%
  4. Weight9.3 kg vs 10.1 kg+9%

Why is ColorEdge CS2731 better than PD3420Q?

  1. Pivot (portrait rotation)No · PD3420Q: Yes
  2. Height adjustment150 mm vs 155 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD3420QBenQ PD3420Q≈ $1,0005.8
Display
Screen size34″27″
Resolution3440 × 14402560 × 1440
Resolution classUltrawide QHDQHD / 2.5K
Pixel density109 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio21:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz61 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms10 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
Adobe RGB coverage—99%
DCI-P3 coverage98%99%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Uniformity compensation—Yes
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)—Yes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—60 W
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesNo
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm155 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)NoYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount—100 × 100 mm
Weight9.3 kg10.1 kg
Width826 mm638 mm
Height445 mm404 mm
Depth244 mm265 mm
Product lineBenQ DesignVue—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare