- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- UltraSharp U3425WE vs ColorEdge CG2400S
Dell UltraSharp U3425WE vs EIZO ColorEdge CG2400S
What UltraSharp U3425WE does better (6) and where ColorEdge CG2400S wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Screen3.4
7.6Colour accuracy5.9
4.9Connectivity3.2
3.5Design & ergonomics8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
UltraSharp U3425WEColorEdge CG2400S
| UltraSharp U3425WE | ColorEdge CG2400S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 543 mm | 408.1 mm | +134.9 mm |
| Width | 813 mm | 554.4 mm | +258.6 mm |
| Depth | 240 mm | 245 mm | −5 mm |
| Weight | 10.8 kg | 8.5 kg | +2.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is UltraSharp U3425WE better than ColorEdge CG2400S?
- Pixel density110 ppi vs 94 ppi+17%
- Response time5 ms vs 11 ms2.2×
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 70 W+29%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 61 Hz+97%
- Screen size34″ vs 24.1″+41%
- Contrast ratio (static)2,000:1 vs 1,800:1+11%
Why is ColorEdge CG2400S better than UltraSharp U3425WE?
- Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 400 nits+33%
- Pivot (portrait rotation)No · UltraSharp U3425WE: Yes
- Weight10.81 kg vs 8.5 kg+27%
- Height adjustment150 mm vs 155 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 34″ | 24.1″ |
| Resolution | 3440 × 1440 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Ultrawide QHD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 110 ppi | 94 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 | 16:10 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 61 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 300 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 2,000:1 | 1,800:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 11 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Curved screen | Yes | — |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 98% | 98% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| Hardware calibration | — | Yes |
| Built-in calibration sensor | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | HDR10 |
| Uniformity compensation | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 70 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Daisy chain (DP MST) | Yes | — |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | No |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | 155 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | No | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 10.81 kg | 8.5 kg |
| Width | 813 mm | 554 mm |
| Height | 543 mm | 408 mm |
| Depth | 240 mm | 245 mm |
| Product line | — | EIZO ColorEdge |
Related comparisons
vs
BenQ MA320UPvsDell UltraSharp U3425WE
6.66.2
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3425WEvsDell UltraSharp U3423WE
6.26.9
vs
BenQ PD2725UvsDell UltraSharp U3425WE
6.86.2
vs
BenQ PD2706UAvsDell UltraSharp U3425WE
6.26.2
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CG2400SvsLenovo ThinkVision P40wd-40
6.06.3
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CG2400SvsEIZO ColorEdge CG2400SV
6.06.2