How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. UltraSharp U4025QW vs UltraFine 40U990A

Dell UltraSharp U4025QW vs LG UltraFine 40U990A

What UltraSharp U4025QW does better (3) and where UltraFine 40U990A wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Dell UltraSharp U4025QW
Dell · 2024UltraSharp U4025QW
8.8Score
3 advantages≈ $1,700
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 40U990A
7.6Score
1 advantage≈ $1,550
8.7Screen9.1
7.8Connectivity8.6
3.2Design & ergonomics2.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

UltraSharp U4025QWUltraFine 40U990A
947 × 622253948 × 614260
UltraSharp U4025QWUltraFine 40U990ADifference
Height622 mm614 mm+8 mm
Width947 mm948 mm−1 mm
Depth253 mm260 mm−7 mm
Weight12.2 kg14.1 kg−1.9 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is UltraSharp U4025QW better than UltraFine 40U990A?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)140 W vs 96 W+46%
  2. Height adjustment150 mm vs 130 mm+15%
  3. Weight12.22 kg vs 14.1 kg+15%

Why is UltraFine 40U990A better than UltraSharp U4025QW?

  1. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size40″39.7″
Resolution5120 × 21605120 × 2160
Resolution class5K5K
Pixel density139 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio21:921:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Brightness (typical)450 nits450 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)600 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)2,000:12,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Curved screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
DCI-P3 coverage99%99%
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRDisplayHDR 600DisplayHDR 600
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)140 W96 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switchYesYes
HDMI inputs12
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Ethernet (RJ45)Yes—
Daisy chain (DP MST)Yes—
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)No—
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight12.22 kg14.1 kg
Width947 mm948 mm
Height622 mm614 mm
Depth253 mm260 mm
Product lineDell UltraSharp—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare