How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. UltraSharp U5226KW vs ColorEdge CG2400SV

Dell UltraSharp U5226KW vs EIZO ColorEdge CG2400SV

What UltraSharp U5226KW does better (7) and where ColorEdge CG2400SV wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Dell UltraSharp U5226KW
Dell · 2026UltraSharp U5226KW
8.1Score
7 advantages≈ $2,500
Higher score
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CG2400SV
EIZO · 2025ColorEdge CG2400SV
6.2Score
2 advantages≈ $2,150
7.8Screen3.4
9.2Colour accuracy5.9
9.7Connectivity3.8
2.1Design & ergonomics8.7

Why is UltraSharp U5226KW better than ColorEdge CG2400SV?

  1. Pixel density129 ppi vs 94 ppi+37%
  2. Screen size51.5″ vs 24.1″2.1×
  3. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  4. DisplayPort inputs2 vs 12×
  5. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 61 Hz+97%
  6. Response time8 ms vs 11 ms+38%
  7. Contrast ratio (static)2,000:1 vs 1,800:1+11%

Why is ColorEdge CG2400SV better than UltraSharp U5226KW?

  1. Pivot (portrait rotation)No · UltraSharp U5226KW: Yes
  2. Height adjustment90 mm vs 155 mm+72%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size51.5″24.1″
Resolution6144 × 25601920 × 1200
Resolution class6KFull HD
Pixel density129 ppi94 ppi
Aspect ratio21:916:10
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate120 Hz61 Hz
Brightness (typical)400 nits400 nits
Contrast ratio (static)2,000:11,800:1
Response time8 ms11 ms
Anti-glare / matte screen—Yes
Curved screenYes—
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
Adobe RGB coverage—99%
DCI-P3 coverage99%98%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibration—Yes
Built-in calibration sensor—Yes
HDR—HDR10
Uniformity compensation—Yes
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)140 W—
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switchYesYes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs21
USB hubYesYes
Ethernet (RJ45)Yes—
Built-in speakersYesNo
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment90 mm155 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)NoYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—8.5 kg
Width—554 mm
Height—408 mm
Depth—245 mm
Product lineDell UltraSharpEIZO ColorEdge
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare