- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- ColorEdge CS3200X vs UltraFine 32UQ85X
EIZO ColorEdge CS3200X vs LG UltraFine 32UQ85X
What ColorEdge CS3200X does better (1) and where UltraFine 32UQ85X wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Screen7.6
4.4Colour accuracy8.2
2.9Connectivity6.3
3.1Design & ergonomics2.0
Why is ColorEdge CS3200X better than UltraFine 32UQ85X?
- SwivelYes · UltraFine 32UQ85X: No
Why is UltraFine 32UQ85X better than ColorEdge CS3200X?
- Response time14 ms vs 5 ms2.8×
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)70 W vs 90 W+29%
- HDRHDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 400 nits+14%
- DCI-P3 coverage96% vs 98%+2%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,300:1 vs 2,000:1+54%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 61 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 350 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,300:1 | 2,000:1 |
| Response time | 14 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| Adobe RGB coverage | 99% | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 96% | 98% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Uniformity compensation | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 70 W | 90 W |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | No | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 141 mm | — |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | No | No |
| Swivel | Yes | No |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Weight | 10.6 kg | — |
| Width | 713 mm | — |
| Height | 432 mm | — |
| Depth | 245 mm | — |
| Product line | EIZO ColorEdge | LG UltraFine |
