- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- M106K vs WH851
GAOMON M106K vs GAOMON WH851
What M106K does better (2) and where WH851 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M106KWH851
| M106K | WH851 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 240 mm | 171 mm | +69 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 289 mm | +71 mm |
| Depth | 10.5 mm | 7.8 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Weight | 0.8 kg | 0.4 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M106K better than WH851?
- Express keys28 vs 83.5×
- Active area (surface)404 cm² vs 258 cm²+57%
Why is WH851 better than M106K?
- Pressure levels2,048 vs 16,3848×
- Wireless connectionNo · M106K: Yes
- Report rate233 RPS vs 300 RPS+29%
- Weight0.78 kg vs 0.39 kg2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 2,048 | 16,384 |
| Tilt recognition | — | ±60° |
| Active area | 254 × 159 mm | 203 × 127 mm |
| Active area width | 254 mm | 203 mm |
| Active area height | 159 mm | 127 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 404 cm² | 258 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | 233 RPS | 300 RPS |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | — | ±0.3 mm |
| Battery-free pen | — | Yes |
| Express keys | 28 | 8 |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless connection | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, ChromeOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.78 kg | 0.39 kg |
| Width | 360 mm | 289 mm |
| Height | 240 mm | 171 mm |
| Depth | 10 mm | 8 mm |
