- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- M106K vs Deco Fun S
GAOMON M106K vs XP-Pen Deco Fun S
What M106K does better (2) and where Deco Fun S wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Pen & controls3.4
4.8Connectivity4.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
M106KDeco Fun S
| M106K | Deco Fun S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 240 mm | 160 mm | +80 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 210 mm | +150 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M106K better than Deco Fun S?
- Active area (surface)404 cm² vs 163 cm²2.5×
- Report rate233 RPS vs 220 RPS+6%
Why is Deco Fun S better than M106K?
- Pressure levels2,048 vs 8,1924×
Specifications
Side by side
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 2,048 | 8,192 |
| Tilt recognition | — | ±60° |
| Active area | 254 × 159 mm | 160 × 102 mm |
| Active area width | 254 mm | 160 mm |
| Active area height | 159 mm | 102 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 404 cm² | 163 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | 233 RPS | 220 RPS |
| Express keys | 28 | — |
| Multi-touch | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, ChromeOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.78 kg | — |
| Width | 360 mm | 210 mm |
| Height | 240 mm | 160 mm |
| Depth | 10 mm | — |
