- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- M10K 2018 vs Deco Mini7
GAOMON M10K 2018 vs XP-Pen Deco Mini7
What M10K 2018 does better (2) and where Deco Mini7 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Pen & controls4.7
4.8Connectivity4.8
3.2Design & ergonomics7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
M10K 2018Deco Mini7
| M10K 2018 | Deco Mini7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 240 mm | 162.2 mm | +77.8 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 260.2 mm | +99.8 mm |
| Depth | 10.5 mm | 9.3 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 0.7 kg | 0.3 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M10K 2018 better than Deco Mini7?
- Express keys13 vs 8+62%
- Active area (surface)408 cm² vs 197 cm²2.1×
Why is Deco Mini7 better than M10K 2018?
- Weight0.69 kg vs 0.31 kg2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 8,192 |
| Tilt recognition | — | ±60° |
| Active area | 255 × 160 mm | 177.8 × 111 mm |
| Active area width | 255 mm | 178 mm |
| Active area height | 160 mm | 111 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 408 cm² | 197 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | — | 220 RPS |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen | — | Battery-free stylus |
| Express keys | 13 | 8 |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, ChromeOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.69 kg | 0.31 kg |
| Width | 360 mm | 260 mm |
| Height | 240 mm | 162 mm |
| Depth | 10 mm | 9 mm |
| Product line | — | XP-Pen Deco |
