- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD1161 vs UE16
GAOMON PD1161 vs UGEE UE16
What PD1161 does better (2) and where UE16 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD1161UE16
| PD1161 | UE16 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 200 mm | 259 mm | −59 mm |
| Width | 362 mm | 438 mm | −76 mm |
| Weight | 0.9 kg | 1.3 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD1161 better than UE16?
- Pixel density190 ppi vs 143 ppi+33%
- Weight0.86 kg vs 1.28 kg+49%
Why is UE16 better than PD1161?
- Pressure levels8,192 vs 16,3842×
- USB-C video input (one cable)No · PD1161: Yes
- Express keys6 vs 8+33%
- Active area (surface)369 cm² vs 655 cm²+78%
- Pen accuracy (centre)±0.5 mm vs ±0.3 mm+67%
- Screen size11.6″ vs 15.4″+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11.6″ | 15.4″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 190 ppi | 143 ppi |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness (typical) | 220 nits | 220 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 25 ms | — |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | — | Yes |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 16,384 |
| Tilt recognition | — | ±60° |
| Active area | 256 × 144 mm | 341 × 192 mm |
| Active area width | 256 mm | 341 mm |
| Active area height | 144 mm | 192 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 369 cm² | 655 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | 266 RPS | — |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | ±0.5 mm | ±0.3 mm |
| Battery-free pen | — | Yes |
| Pen with eraser | — | Yes |
| Express keys | 6 | 8 |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | No | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | — |
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS | Windows, macOS, Android, ChromeOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.86 kg | 1.28 kg |
| Width | 362 mm | 438 mm |
| Height | 200 mm | 259 mm |
| Depth | — | 13 mm |
