- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD2200 vs UE16
GAOMON PD2200 vs UGEE UE16
What PD2200 does better (2) and where UE16 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD2200UE16
| PD2200 | UE16 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 316 mm | 259 mm | +57 mm |
| Width | 522 mm | 438 mm | +84 mm |
| Depth | 9.5 mm | 13 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Weight | 3.8 kg | 1.3 kg | +2.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD2200 better than UE16?
- Active area (surface)1,278 cm² vs 655 cm²+95%
- Screen size21.5″ vs 15.4″+40%
Why is UE16 better than PD2200?
- Pressure levels8,192 vs 16,3842×
- USB-C video input (one cable)No · PD2200: Yes
- Pixel density102 ppi vs 143 ppi+40%
- Weight3.84 kg vs 1.28 kg3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 21.5″ | 15.4″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 102 ppi | 143 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness (typical) | 220 nits | 220 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 16,384 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | ±60° |
| Active area | 477 × 268 mm | 341 × 192 mm |
| Active area width | 477 mm | 341 mm |
| Active area height | 268 mm | 192 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 1,278 cm² | 655 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | 266 RPS | — |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | — | ±0.3 mm |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen with eraser | — | Yes |
| Express keys | 8 | 8 |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | No | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | — |
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS | Windows, macOS, Android, ChromeOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 3.84 kg | 1.28 kg |
| Width | 522 mm | 438 mm |
| Height | 316 mm | 259 mm |
| Depth | 10 mm | 13 mm |
