- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- Inspiroy Dial Q620M vs XMCTBMJPKR-SE
Huion Inspiroy Dial Q620M vs Xencelabs XMCTBMJPKR-SE
What Inspiroy Dial Q620M does better (2) and where XMCTBMJPKR-SE wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.5Design & ergonomics2.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Inspiroy Dial Q620MXMCTBMJPKR-SE
| Inspiroy Dial Q620M | XMCTBMJPKR-SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 220 mm | 232 mm | −12 mm |
| Width | 376 mm | 320 mm | +56 mm |
| Weight | 0.7 kg | 0.7 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Inspiroy Dial Q620M better than XMCTBMJPKR-SE?
- Active area (surface)446 cm² vs 387 cm²+15%
- Weight0.66 kg vs 0.71 kg+8%
Why is XMCTBMJPKR-SE better than Inspiroy Dial Q620M?
XMCTBMJPKR-SE has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 8,192 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | — |
| Active area | 267 × 167 mm | 262.4 × 147.4 mm |
| Active area width | 267 mm | 262 mm |
| Active area height | 167 mm | 147 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 446 cm² | 387 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | — |
| Report rate | 233 RPS | — |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | — |
| Express keys | 8 | — |
| Multi-touch | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless connection | Yes | — |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS, Android | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.66 kg | 0.71 kg |
| Width | 376 mm | 320 mm |
| Height | 220 mm | 232 mm |
| Depth | — | 8 mm |
| Product line | Huion Inspiroy | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Wacom One SmallvsHuion Inspiroy Dial Q620M
9.07.8
vs
Wacom One MediumvsHuion Inspiroy Dial Q620M
7.67.8
vs
XP-Pen Deco MWvsHuion Inspiroy Dial Q620M
9.07.8
vs
XP-Pen Deco Mini7vsHuion Inspiroy Dial Q620M
6.87.8
vs
XP-Pen Deco Pro LW (Gen 2)vsHuion Inspiroy Dial Q620M
vs
XP-Pen Deco Mini7WvsHuion Inspiroy Dial Q620M
7.87.8