How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Kamvas 16 (Gen 3) vs One 13 Touch

Huion Kamvas 16 (Gen 3) vs Wacom One 13 Touch

What Kamvas 16 (Gen 3) does better (3) and where One 13 Touch wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Huion Kamvas 16 (Gen 3)
Huion · 2025Kamvas 16 (Gen 3)
8.1Score
3 advantages≈ $460
Higher score
vs
Wacom One 13 Touch
Wacom · 2023One 13 Touch
1 advantage≈ $430
7.5Design & ergonomics8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Kamvas 16 (Gen 3)One 13 Touch
421.2 × 236.812.6336 × 22212
Kamvas 16 (Gen 3)One 13 TouchDifference
Height236.8 mm222 mm+14.8 mm
Width421.2 mm336 mm+85.2 mm
Depth12.6 mm12 mm+0.6 mm
Weight1.2 kg0.9 kg+0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Kamvas 16 (Gen 3) better than One 13 Touch?

  1. Pressure levels16,384 vs 4,0964×
  2. Active area (surface)690 cm² vs 426 cm²+62%
  3. Screen size15.8″ vs 12.9″+22%

Why is One 13 Touch better than Kamvas 16 (Gen 3)?

  1. Weight1.25 kg vs 0.9 kg+39%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size15.8″12.9″
Resolution2560 × 1440—
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K—
Pixel density186 ppi—
Aspect ratio16:9—
Panel typeIPS—
Brightness (typical)220 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1—
Response time14 ms—
Anti-glare / matte screenYes—
Fully laminated screenYes—
Colour
Colour depth8 bit—
Factory calibrated (report)Yes—
Pen & controls
Pressure levels16,3844,096
Tilt recognition±60°—
Active area350 × 197 mm294 × 145 mm
Active area width350 mm294 mm
Active area height197 mm145 mm
Active area (surface)690 cm²426 cm²
Pen resolution5,080 lpi—
Report rate260 RPS—
Pen accuracy (centre)±0.3 mm—
Battery-free penYes—
PenPW600L (PenTech 4.0)—
Express keys6—
Dials, wheels & touch rings2—
Multi-touchNo—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
Wireless connectionNo—
CompatibilityWindows, macOS, Linux, Android—
Design & ergonomics
StandST300 (Optional)—
Weight1.25 kg0.9 kg
Width421 mm336 mm
Height237 mm222 mm
Depth13 mm12 mm
Product lineHuion Kamvas—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare