- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- M708 vs U1600
UGEE M708 vs UGEE U1600
What M708 does better (0) and where U1600 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M708U1600
| M708 | U1600 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 210 mm | 263 mm | −53 mm |
| Width | 359 mm | 402 mm | −43 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M708 better than U1600?
M708 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is U1600 better than M708?
- Active area (surface)386 cm² vs 655 cm²+70%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 15.4″ |
| Resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | — | Full HD |
| Pixel density | — | 143 ppi |
| Brightness (typical) | — | 220 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | — | 1,000:1 |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 8,192 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | ±60° |
| Active area | 254 × 152 mm | 341 × 192 mm |
| Active area width | 254 mm | 341 mm |
| Active area height | 152 mm | 192 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 386 cm² | 655 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | 266 RPS | — |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | — | ±0.5 mm |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen with eraser | — | Yes |
| Express keys | 8 | — |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS, Linux, ChromeOS | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | — | 1.32 kg |
| Width | 359 mm | 402 mm |
| Height | 210 mm | 263 mm |
